<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://computer-internet.marc8.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>registering domain names</title>
 <link>http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/registering-domain-names</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ICANN Finally Relaxes TLD Requirements -- But It Still Looks Lik...</title>
 <link>http://computer-internet.marc8.com/icann-finally-relaxes-tld-requirements-it-still-looks-lik</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For years, we&#039;ve been among those who wondered what good it did for ICANN to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/001117/0324250.shtml&quot;&gt;dribble&lt;/a&gt; out new top level domains (TLDs -- such as .info, .biz, .aero, etc.) every few years. For the most part, these new domains didn&#039;t do much other than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20010705/1455214.shtml&quot;&gt;force companies&lt;/a&gt; to buy their name on each new TLD as it was released. It basically just seemed like a way for ICANN and registrars to keep fleecing companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://computer-internet.marc8.com/icann-finally-relaxes-tld-requirements-it-still-looks-lik&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://computer-internet.marc8.com/icann-finally-relaxes-tld-requirements-it-still-looks-lik#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/taxonomy/term/9">Top stories</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/address-work">address work</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/new-top-level-domains">new top level domains</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/registering-name">registering a name</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/registering-domain-names">registering domain names</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/top-level-domains">top level domains</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://computer-internet.marc8.com/crss/node/8983</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:15:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8983 at http://computer-internet.marc8.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unnecessary Anti-Phishing Law Potentially Even Worse Than First ...</title>
 <link>http://computer-internet.marc8.com/unnecessary-anti-phishing-law-potentially-even-worse-first</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Last month, we wrote about a bill proposed in the Senate that would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080226/195527365.shtml&quot;&gt;outlaw phishing&lt;/a&gt; even though phishing is already illegal. If it merely restated that phishing was illegal, that would be one thing (a basic waste), but it also added some other points that were problematic, including taking away the right to anonymity in registering domain names. It turns out the bill may actually be much worse than that -- but it may depend on how it&#039;s read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://computer-internet.marc8.com/unnecessary-anti-phishing-law-potentially-even-worse-first&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://computer-internet.marc8.com/unnecessary-anti-phishing-law-potentially-even-worse-first#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/taxonomy/term/9">Top stories</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/eff">eff</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/leeway">leeway</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/local-newspapers">local newspapers</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/registering-domain-names">registering domain names</category>
 <category domain="http://computer-internet.marc8.com/news-tags/trademark-violation">trademark violation</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://computer-internet.marc8.com/crss/node/2627</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:39:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2627 at http://computer-internet.marc8.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
